> * which devices do we need to cover?
>* beagleboard -- would probably work in QEMU
>* google nexus one
>* should probably cover vexpress and imx51 babbage
FYI, we have a guy in ARM who created patches to run Android on ARM realView
platforms using upstream linux kernel or Catalin's
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> Loic, did you mean to say that it's _easy_ to backport it or _not easy_?
I was told the patches are NOT hard to backport because they are
relatively self contained
--
Lo?c Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010, Guillaume Letellier wrote:
> FYI, we have a guy in ARM who created patches to run Android on ARM
> realView platforms using upstream linux kernel or Catalin's kernel
> tree (ARM AEL) - i.e. the patches are the diff between the upstream
> tree and Google's trees + a few patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/10 16:39, Loïc Minier wrote:
>* main use case would be the devicetree stuff; that one is really
> easy to backport, so might not be a good idea to move Android
> forward
Loic, did you mean to say that it's _easy_ to
