I haven't had much luck with Linaro Linux 3.1 and 3.3. However, version 3.2
released in January (https://launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+milestone/3.2-2012.01)
seems to boot up and shut down well. I know it isn't a prebuilt image, but
right
now manually compiling the kernel with omap2plus_defconfig
; Sudhangathan BS
>> Ph:(+91) 9731-905-205
>> -
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Fathi Boudra
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 May 2012 10:51, Sudhangathan B S wrote:
>>> > I' getting this er
-
> Sudhangathan BS
> Ph:(+91) 9731-905-205
> -
>
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Fathi Boudra
> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 May 2012 10:51, Sudhangathan B S wrote:
>> > I' getting this error dur
gt; > I' getting this error during boot on a freshly dd'd image of alip or nano
> > prebuilt images.
>
> Please, could you add a link to the exact image you used?
> Latest pre-built images are available on
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/precise/pre-built/
>
___
On 18 May 2012 10:51, Sudhangathan B S wrote:
> I' getting this error during boot on a freshly dd'd image of alip or nano
> prebuilt images.
Please, could you add a link to the exact image you used?
Latest pre-built images are available on
http://snapshots.linaro.org/p
I' getting this error during boot on a freshly dd'd image of alip or nano
prebuilt images.
[5.487091] generic-usb 0003:046D:C018.0003: input: USB HID v1.11 Mouse
[Log0
[5.755706] udevd[733]: starting version 173
Begin: Loading essential drivers ... done.
Begin: Running /sc
ile system type {ext4?}
> = 45 prebuilt images
>
> Look right?
Looks about right. There are more hwpacks than that currently, I'm not
sure what criteria we should use for deciding which to provide prebuilt
images for. Alexander?
Thanks,
James
ard types { beagle (C & Xm), IGEP, imx51, iMX53, Overo,
Panda, Orion, U8500, Versatile Express}
x1 file system type {ext4?}
= 45 prebuilt images
Look right?
> * After that time take a look at the download counts and re-evaluate
>the tradeoffs,
On Mon, 23 May 2011 13:11:37 -0300, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> But when compressed the free space doesn't make any difference, does it?
> I've gzipped a 2GB desktop image last week and it went down to around
> 500MB IIRC.
That's a good point, I forgot that we are compressing them.
Therefore I
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 12:49 -0400, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:27 +0100, David Gilbert
> wrote:
> > On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
> > > wrote:
> > >> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produ
On 20 May 2011 18:27, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 18:10, David Gilbert wrote:
>> On 20 May 2011 17:50, Paul Larson wrote:
>>> The Ubuntu Images have an extra bit that happens on first boot where it
>>> expands itself to consume your entire SD card.
>>
>> Sounds a good trick; can't we j
On 20 May 2011 18:10, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 17:50, Paul Larson wrote:
>> The Ubuntu Images have an extra bit that happens on first boot where it
>> expands itself to consume your entire SD card.
>
> Sounds a good trick; can't we just use that as well?
We discussed that at the UDS
Hi,
On 20 May 2011 15:03, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
> for everything rather than trying to second guess which we can get
> away with not generating.
Instead of trying to 2nd guess and preserve disk space, what about
checking the fact
On 20 May 2011 17:50, Paul Larson wrote:
>> I don't quite understand your maths there; if you look at the Ubuntu ARM
>> images
>> they are 540MB for netbook and 200MB for headless (compressed).
>> So at 6 boards to support that's ~4.2GB/month or ~50GB/year which is a lot
>> less scary.
>>
> The U
>
> P.S. if anyone replies saying that it doesn't matter because disk space
> is cheap, I shall be forced to nominate you as Linaro sysadmin for this
cycle.
Ha! :) Only for this cycle?
> I don't quite understand your maths there; if you look at the Ubuntu ARM
> images
> they are 540MB for netb
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:32:27 +0100, David Gilbert
wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> >> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
> >> for everything rather than trying to second guess wh
On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
>> for everything rather than trying to second guess which we can get
>> away with not generating.
>
> While that's a nice s
On 20 May 2011 17:12, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
>> for everything rather than trying to second guess which we can get
>> away with not generating.
>
> While that's a nice s
On Fri, 20 May 2011 16:03:16 +0100, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> We're only doing this once a month, we should just produce images
> for everything rather than trying to second guess which we can get
> away with not generating.
While that's a nice sentiment, we can't ignore the disk space usage that
t
But getting back to your question, I don't think we should produce
prebuilt images for all derivations. I would pick the most popular
image and couple of the most popular board types as a start. If lots
of people download and there's clammering for more, than hopefully
would be easy e
On 20 May 2011 15:38, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> During LDS we agreed to provide prebuilt Linaro images at our
> milestones[1], for users who can't/won't run linaro-media-create. One
> thing we forgot to discuss, though, is if it's worth doing so for all
> image types or just for the LEB(s).
>
> O
Hi,
During LDS we agreed to provide prebuilt Linaro images at our
milestones[1], for users who can't/won't run linaro-media-create. One
thing we forgot to discuss, though, is if it's worth doing so for all
image types or just for the LEB(s).
Our downloads page (http://www.linaro.org/downloads/) h
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:37 -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Several people have suggested that we should start providing prebuilt
> > Linaro images for those who can't/won't install and run
> > linaro-media-create (or a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Several people have suggested that we should start providing prebuilt
> Linaro images for those who can't/won't install and run
> linaro-media-create (or any other tool that they have to install in
> order to generate an imag
, don't forget to subscribe to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-prebuilt-images
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
25 matches
Mail list logo
