Re: Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

2010-09-01 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 31 sierpnia 2010 o 21:42:54 Loïc Minier napisał(a): > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote: > > That option probably only works if repacking the .deb, right? I would > > expect dpkg-gencontrol to ignore any ($version) in the source > > debian/control. It does not ignore - it fa

Re: Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

2010-08-31 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote: > That option probably only works if repacking the .deb, right? I would > expect dpkg-gencontrol to ignore any ($version) in the source > debian/control. Oh yes, that's why I was suggesting passing -c + -l; I think this might work without repacking th

Re: Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

2010-08-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:52:06PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > Note that because the version of the binaries and the version of your > source differ, your source field needs to be "Source: armel-cross > (yourversion goes here)" That option probably only works if repacking the .deb, right? I wo

Re: Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

2010-08-30 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > sed -i -e "s/^binutils/armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" debian/changelog; \ > sed -i -e "s/^Source: binutils/Source: armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" > debian/control.in; \ > sed -i -e "s/^Source: binutils/Source: armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" > debian/

Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

2010-08-30 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Hi First some informations. "armel-cross-toolchain" is a package which will generate armel cross toolchain for x86(-64) machines (but nothing keeps from building powerpc->armel one etc). Do to that I am building several stages of linux/eglibc/gcc-4.5/binutils in proper order. This is called 'boot