On 03/17/2011 10:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Thanks for the excellent writeup! For u-boot, I find this a bit
> surprizing as I thought Overo was well supported in upstream u-boot; in
> any case, please do file a bug against u-boot-linaro on this. It's
> quite likely patches not yet upstream t
Thanks for the excellent writeup! For u-boot, I find this a bit
surprizing as I thought Overo was well supported in upstream u-boot; in
any case, please do file a bug against u-boot-linaro on this. It's
quite likely patches not yet upstream to u-boot which we might find in
Steve Sakoman's tr
Ash Charles of Gumstix recently noted that the Linaro image for Overo
seemed to perform slower than the one they create.
I've spent a little time investigating this. I'm not familiar with
this type of code and apologize if my terminology is off. However, I
think there's an issue in the Linaro uboo
