On 1 August 2013 20:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> > The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
>>
>> ...maybe we could fix it?
>
> It has been suggested that should be deleted as people
On 2 August 2013 01:14, Andy Green wrote:
> On 2 August 2013 07:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> x86 manages to do much better here because the "everything
>> looks like a PC" effect means it's much easier for the kernel
>> to produce output to serial or video very early. It's much
>> easier to config
On 2 August 2013 07:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 August 2013 00:26, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 2 August 2013 01:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>>> with vexpress we have the added complication thrown into the mix that
>>> people use it a lot with QEMU ;-)
>>
>> ...if there's something special nee
On 2 August 2013 00:26, Andy Green wrote:
> On 2 August 2013 01:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> with vexpress we have the added complication thrown into the mix that
>> people use it a lot with QEMU ;-)
>
> ...if there's something special needed for QEMU, maybe the fragments
> are the right ans
On 2 August 2013 01:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> > The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
>>
>> ...maybe we could fix it?
>
> It has been suggested that should be deleted as people
On 1 August 2013 18:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> > The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
>>
>> ...maybe we could fix it?
Not that we've had this conversation many times before, b
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> > The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
>
> ...maybe we could fix it?
It has been suggested that should be deleted as people can use the
multiplatform defconfig (though I believe that
On 1 August 2013 09:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> The vexpress defconfig has always been broken.
...maybe we could fix it?
-- PMM
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 08/01/2013 01:30 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Historically, the main reason for us creating the frags was because of
the platforms (eg, Ubuntu) adding lots of config options that weren't
in the defconfig. The vexpress defconfig has always been broken. But
over-riding the defconfig with Ubuntu/Andr
On 1 August 2013 16:30, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 1 August 2013 07:57, Andy Green wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 14:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi Andrey,
>>>
>>> linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time
>>> to
>>> organize it better for the future. There can be mult
On 1 August 2013 07:57, Andy Green wrote:
> On 1 August 2013 14:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Andrey,
>>
>> linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time to
>> organize it better for the future. There can be multiple things that we can
>> do to avoid confusions of nam
On 1 August 2013 14:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time to
> organize it better for the future. There can be multiple things that we can
> do to avoid confusions of names but for now probably we can create
> separate d
Hi Andrey,
linaro/configs/* is getting bigger and bigger, probably its the right time to
organize it better for the future. There can be multiple things that we can
do to avoid confusions of names but for now probably we can create
separate directories for boards, rootfs & kernel fragments? Or som
13 matches
Mail list logo
