On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:17 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
>> > predicated on renaming the top level.
>> >
>> The m
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:09:23 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby
> wrote:
>
> > Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> > predicated on renaming the top level.
> >
> The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it'
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, James Westby wrote:
> Note that Paul requests keeping the suffixes, but I guess that's
> predicated on renaming the top level.
>
The main reason I like having a suffix of some kind is so that it's obvious
which series it's from by the filename. If someone includes
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:37:15 -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> Thanks for the update James. Say related we have the following hwpack
> directory names:
>
> efikamx-oneiric
> igep-oneiric
> imx51-oneiric
> omap3-oneiric
> omap3-x11-base-oneiric
> overo-oneiric
> pa
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:46:57AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> >> >> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> >> >> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
> >> >> "ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> >> >
> >> > These images are all Ubuntu based
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> >>> Also, it
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:29 AM, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
>> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
> >>
> >>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:27:38 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> on the same front I see we still redirect ubuntu-build to offspring ... can
> we flip that
> around? e.g. make offspring.l.o redirect to ubuntu-build?
Yes, just file an RT to request the change.
Thanks,
James
__
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 12:23:12 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 2. use directory structure matching the project group names used on
> offspring.linaro.org; e.g. natty-hwpacks, natty-images, oneiric-hwpacks,
> oneiric-Images, etc.
This would be a useful step in removing the need to request syncs from
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:29:47 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
> reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Woul
On 7 October 2011 13:16, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>>
>> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
>> has na
On 7 October 2011 15:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
>
> Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
> has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling i
On 7 October 2011 11:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Also, it strikes me that we only use snapshots.linaro.org for ubuntu
Eh? snapshots has more than just the ubuntu desktop images -- it
has nano, alip, hwpacks and all the rest. I think calling it
"ubuntu-build" would be rather confusing...
> 1. mo
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> >> any reason for the lack of consistency between d
On 7 October 2011 13:23, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>
>> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
>> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
>> v
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there
> any reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
> vs.
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
>
> Would
I know this has come up before, but I'd like to raise it again: Is there any
reason for the lack of consistency between directory layouts for:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/
vs.
http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/
Would it be possible to rename the oneiric directory to 11.11-daily and
s
18 matches
Mail list logo
