On Fri, Sep 03, 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I filed LP #629671 to track this after reproducing with the latest
> native toolchain which has the latest Linaro released patches.
Mariano, mind subscribing to this Launchpad bug since you're the
original reporter?
Thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
__
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:06:03AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> > Now, with 4.4 and 4.5, I'm having the following build problem:
> [...]
> >See for instructions.
>
> Ah that's interesting; which exact compiler are you using? Could you
> provide
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> For the problem to appear you must use -Os -march=armv4t and the
> volatile assignment. E.g.:
>
> bad:
> arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -Os -march=armv4t -c -o tests.o tests.c
>
> ok:
> arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv4t -c -o tests.o tests.c
> arm-linu
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Mariano Alvira wrote:
> Now, with 4.4 and 4.5, I'm having the following build problem:
[...]
>See for instructions.
Ah that's interesting; which exact compiler are you using? Could you
provide a minimal test case we could reproduce this bug with?
--
Loïc Minier
___
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:30:31PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> Mar, how are you getting this? Maybe there is a simple solution to
> calling the ROM thumb code that we haven't discovered yet.
>
Right now I'm thinking that I have callee-super in there as a
hold-over from back when I first was star
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> [ un-breaking Loic email address in CC so people reply to the right
>>> place--- not sure what happened there ]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> [ un-breaking Loic email address in CC so people reply to the right
>> place--- not sure what happened there ]
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> [ un-breaking Loic email address in CC so people reply to the right
> place--- not sure what happened there ]
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
[ un-breaking Loic email address in CC so people reply to the right
place--- not sure what happened there ]
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -DDEBUG -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
>
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
>
>>
>> > arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -DDEBUG -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
>> > -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -ffunction-sections -msoft-float -Wcast-align
>> > -Wall -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE= -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -isystem
>> > /usr/lib/gcc/arm
>
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -DDEBUG -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
> > -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -ffunction-sections -msoft-float -Wcast-align
> > -Wall -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE= -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -isystem
> > /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.1/include -pipe -march=armv4t
> > -mlong-calls
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010, Jon Smirl wrote:
> The toolchain isn't built with -mcallee-super-interworking enabled.
> Could we get that turned on? It is needed to make calls to thumb code
> in ROM.
Sounds like an extra header on all functions for which we'd pay a size
price, while the current maverick
The toolchain isn't built with -mcallee-super-interworking enabled.
Could we get that turned on? It is needed to make calls to thumb code
in ROM.
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -DDEBUG -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-common -ffixed-r8 -ffunction-sections -msoft-float -Wcast-align
-Wall -D__KERNEL__ -DTEX
13 matches
Mail list logo
