On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Problem is that with CI we cannot really hold off submitting jobs because
> that happens ad-hoc when a build finishes.
>
Agree, this isn't always easy, but neat to see that infrastructure has a
workaround for it already.
> I understand th
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:18:04 +0100
Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Dave Pigott
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On 11 Nov 2011, at 10:56, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Dave,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:36:45 +
> > > Dave Pigott wrote:
> > >
> > > []
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 11 Nov 2011, at 10:56, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>
> > Hello Dave,
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:36:45 +
> > Dave Pigott wrote:
> >
> > []
> >> look and feel!), we're asking that you hold off submitting jobs to
> >> LAVA unt
Hi Paul,
On 11 Nov 2011, at 10:56, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:36:45 +
> Dave Pigott wrote:
>
> []
>> look and feel!), we're asking that you hold off submitting jobs to
>> LAVA until we give the go-ahead.
>
> "Hold-off" as in "please don't submit jobs n
Hello Dave,
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:36:45 +
Dave Pigott wrote:
[]
> look and feel!), we're asking that you hold off submitting jobs to
> LAVA until we give the go-ahead.
"Hold-off" as in "please don't submit jobs now - they disrupt us", or
"if you submit now, be prepared to not get expected
