Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-05 Thread John Stultz
On 04/04/2013 07:53 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 April 2013 07:58, John Stultz wrote: On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run O=../ ? Hmm.. when we compile kernel we can give O=../output-folder as an parameter and so i

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 5 April 2013 07:58, John Stultz wrote: > On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run > > O=../ ? Hmm.. when we compile kernel we can give O=../output-folder as an parameter and so image/binaries will be created in ../outp

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-04 Thread John Stultz
On 04/04/2013 06:34 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 5 April 2013 00:18, John Stultz wrote: Yea, I'll push it upstream and send it to Andrey for Linux Linaro. Thanks for the testing. There are more problems than this i believe... Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 5 April 2013 00:18, John Stultz wrote: > Yea, I'll push it upstream and send it to Andrey for Linux Linaro. Thanks > for the testing. There are more problems than this i believe... Everytime i run merge_config.sh even with O=../ option, i have to run make mrproper to clean other stuff otherwi

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-04 Thread John Stultz
On 04/03/2013 09:27 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 3 April 2013 22:53, John Stultz wrote: Huh. I'm totally unfamiliar with this. Looks like when adding support for the -O option, if its not used, we end up passing -O=. to make, which generates the unnecessary source softlink. Does the attached pa

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 3 April 2013 22:53, John Stultz wrote: > Huh. I'm totally unfamiliar with this. > > Looks like when adding support for the -O option, if its not used, we end up > passing -O=. to make, which generates the unnecessary source softlink. > > Does the attached patch fix it for you? Yes it does.. Th

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-03 Thread John Stultz
On 04/03/2013 10:01 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 3 April 2013 21:41, John Stultz wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi John, I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory in my kernel tree"? And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running merge_

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 3 April 2013 21:41, John Stultz wrote: > On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> >> Hi John, >> >> I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory >> in my kernel tree"? >> And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running >> merge_config.sh creates >> it..

Re: Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-03 Thread John Stultz
On 04/02/2013 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Hi John, I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory in my kernel tree"? And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running merge_config.sh creates it.. And it isn't cleaned up even by running make mrproper... PS: I am

Issues with merge_config.sh

2013-04-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi John, I have been struggling since some time "who creates source directory in my kernel tree"? And i thought to clean up the mess today and found running merge_config.sh creates it.. And it isn't cleaned up even by running make mrproper... PS: I am not using O=../ option.