On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
>
> I just tested two a nano images using ext4 and they didn't find the
> root file system. So, we are at least gated on that bug.
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+bug/822593 to make
ext4 our default. Seems that our kernel
On 4 August 2011 15:37, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 4 August 2011 15:28, James Tunnicliffe
> wrote:
>> On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert wrote:
>>> On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe
>>> wrote:
I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is
because dd
On 4 August 2011 15:28, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert wrote:
>> On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe
>> wrote:
>>> I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is
>>> because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the fi
On 4 August 2011 14:56, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe
> wrote:
>> I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is
>> because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the first
>> meg or so of data onto the card, then write in 4M
On 4 August 2011 14:52, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> I have seen poor performance when DDing to a card, which I assume is
> because dd is not writing large aligned chunks. If we can dd the first
> meg or so of data onto the card, then write in 4MB chunks that are all
> 4MB aligned that should be qui
On 4 August 2011 13:07, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> IMHO it is not stable enough and I am not sure it is worth having such
> filesystem as it is mainly used for snapshotting. The last time I played
> with it, the FS was quickly corrupted but I don't have to complain
> because the kernel configuration
> As I understand it, btrfs is considered OK for file systems running on
> systems that don't suffer from power failure, so for writing an image
> and testing it this should be fine.
>
> So, what do people think about switching?
I too would be considered about filesystem integrity given the nu
Hi James
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, James Tunnicliffe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
> bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
> to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to.
> This slows do
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:46:58 +0100
James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
> bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
> to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to.
> This slows down cre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 01:46 PM, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
> bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
> to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time
On 4 August 2011 12:46, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
> bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
> to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to.
> This slows down creating images
Hi,
Our current default root file system, ext3, is proving to be a
bottleneck for SD card performance. Not only does it take a long time
to format the partitions, but it also takes a long time to write to.
This slows down creating images on SD cards a lot. I just did a very
simple experiment runni
12 matches
Mail list logo
