Hi,
sorry for the late reply...
On Monday 28 February 2011 17:52:23 Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
...
> Also, cpuidle states name in pytimechart are very selfishly hardcoded
> with intel's convention.
> Can you tell what is your co
>> Thomas (added in the To: list) attempted to introduce some abbreviated
>> states names but I do not know if this went through to the mainline
>> and if it is applicable to pytimechart. Cf. [1] for the patch.
> There is another patch for omap from santosh that adds description for
> each of the C
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jean Pihet
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Pierre,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
>>> wrote:
On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
On 28 February 2011 16:30, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
> wrote:
>> On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I have started to use the new cpuidl
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have started to use the new cpuidle tracepoint and created a plugin
>>> for pytimechart.
>>> I'm not sure if i
On 27 February 2011 17:31, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started to use the new cpuidle tracepoint and created a plugin
>> for pytimechart.
>> I'm not sure if it's the right way to add this cpuidle trace format
>> update but i
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have started to use the new cpuidle tracepoint and created a plugin
> for pytimechart.
> I'm not sure if it's the right way to add this cpuidle trace format
> update but it's the less intrusive one.
Yes, it is okay. I actually p
Hi,
I have started to use the new cpuidle tracepoint and created a plugin
for pytimechart.
I'm not sure if it's the right way to add this cpuidle trace format
update but it's the less intrusive one.
I also have a plugin for new cpu_hotplug trace points but i'm waiting
for trace approval before se
11 matches
Mail list logo