Dear Minkyu Kang,
On 6 January 2012 07:10, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 5 January 2012 19:31, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu Kang,
>>
>> On 5 January 2012 12:13, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>>>
>>> On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap
>>> wrote
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
On 5 January 2012 17:02, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > No need to reuse the code, if SoCs are different.
>> > If need, please separate the functions.
>>
>> Yes, though SoC's are different, the functionality in clock.c is
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 5 January 2012 19:31, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Hi Minkyu Kang,
>
> On 5 January 2012 12:13, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>>
>> On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap
>> wrote:
> > Torsten Koschorrek
> > scb9328 ARM920T (i.MXL
Dear Chander Kashyap,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > No need to reuse the code, if SoCs are different.
> > If need, please separate the functions.
>
> Yes, though SoC's are different, the functionality in clock.c is
> similar. The only difference is the clock name in the clock structure
> for Exyn
Hi Minkyu Kang,
On 5 January 2012 12:13, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Torsten Koschorrek
> scb9328 ARM920T (i.MXL)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/e
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 27 December 2011 17:48, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>>> > Torsten Koschorrek
>>> > scb9328 ARM920T (i.MXL)
>>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> > index b101f96..88e2fc0 100644
>>> > --- a/arch/arm/
Dear Minkyu Kang,
On 27 December 2011 14:18, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Dear minkyu Kang
>
> On 23 December 2011 11:21, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>>
>> On 23 December 2011 09:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>>>
>>> On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap
Dear minkyu Kang
On 23 December 2011 11:21, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> On 23 December 2011 09:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>
>> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>>
>> On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap
>> wrote:
>> > SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC.
>> >
>> > Sig
Hi Chander,
Subject line of patch: s/EEYNOS/EXYNOS
On 23 December 2011 11:21, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> On 23 December 2011 09:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> >
> > Dear Chander Kashyap,
> >
> > On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap
> wrote:
> > > SMDK5250 board is based on
Dear Minkyu Kang,
On 23 December 2011 09:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> > SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 24 +-
> arc
11 matches
Mail list logo