On 13 June 2012 15:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:20 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>> In v3.4, x86 hasn't got any specific declaration for
>> arch_scale_freq_power so it would now use the weak
>> arch_scale_freq_power which calls default_scale_freq_power. Isn't it
>> enoug
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:20 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
> In v3.4, x86 hasn't got any specific declaration for
> arch_scale_freq_power so it would now use the weak
> arch_scale_freq_power which calls default_scale_freq_power. Isn't it
> enough ?
---
Subject: sched, x86: Remove broken power e
On 13 June 2012 14:50, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:02 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
>> to reflect the relative capacity of each core
>
> I think I've pointed out before that this breaks x86.. you need a patch
>
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:02 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
> to reflect the relative capacity of each core
I think I've pointed out before that this breaks x86.. you need a patch
killing at that stuff before this.
> Signed-off-by: Vi
Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
to reflect the relative capacity of each core
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot
---
kernel/sched/features.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index d
