Hi Amit,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 20:06:29, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
> bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
I think it is OK to send the fixes to Len right away so
he can queue the fixes during merge window if he gets the
chanc
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:52:45, Robert Lee wrote:
> Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
> handling from this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Lee
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet
> static struct cpuidle_dri
Rob, you should start a new '3.4-fixes' branch containing such
bugfixes that can be pushed to Len after -rc1.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
> looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my par
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
> looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my part (see
> below). Fix is trivial. I've check all other platforms and confirmed
> this problem does not exist f
Sekhar tested this patch on Davinci last night and found a problem. I
looked at the code again and found a mindless omission on my part (see
below). Fix is trivial. I've check all other platforms and confirmed
this problem does not exist for those. Will resend a v9 of the
patchset shortly.
On
Enable core cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling and remove that
handling from this code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano
Acked-by: Jean Pihet
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpuidle.c | 82 ---
1 file changed, 33
