On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:11:48AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> changes have no dependencies with any other DT series. I will repost
> all of Tero/Peter and my changes (to add DT support to the driver) as
> one single series and drop the dts file updates, which I guess can go
> via Tony/OMAP tre
On Monday 27 February 2012 08:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
If adding device tree support breaks existing platforms something is
going wrong, while you're pulling things together device tree might not
work until all the support makes it in but the old non-DT code should
continue to function.
Adding
On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
re-sending ad
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>
>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Mmm, it is written in Rajendra's changelog:
> "-2- All common regulator nodes for twl4030 and twl6030 are
> now defined in the twl4030.dtsi and twl6030.dtsi instead of
Oh, it's buried at the end of a rather verbose inter-patch ch
On 2/27/2012 3:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
> >- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow
Hi Mark,
On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
Please can you guys come up with a single unified ser
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying any
On Monday 27 February 2012 05:45 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi Rajendra,
On 02/27/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Re-sending on top of Tero's changes which are already
in -next and the one which adds support for twl6030
vdd1/2/3 SMPS [1].
Would you be able to add support for V1V8, V2V1 S
Hi Rajendra,
On 02/27/2012 12:35 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Re-sending on top of Tero's changes which are already
> in -next and the one which adds support for twl6030
> vdd1/2/3 SMPS [1].
Would you be able to add support for V1V8, V2V1 SMPS supplies in
twl6030? These regulators are need on SD
Re-sending on top of Tero's changes which are already
in -next and the one which adds support for twl6030
vdd1/2/3 SMPS [1].
v3 has mainly 2 differences from v2
-1- TWL driver now uses just one table for both dt and
non-dt based lookup for driver data.
-2- All common regulator nodes for twl4030 a
Re-sending as these patches did not make it to the lists due to
issues with my 'git send-email'
v3 has mainly 2 differences from v2
-1- TWL driver now uses just one table for both dt and
non-dt based lookup for driver data.
-2- All common regulator nodes for twl4030 and twl6030 are
now defined in
13 matches
Mail list logo
