Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpumask: introduce cpumask for hotpluggable CPUs

2011-08-11 Thread Turquette, Mike
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > See comments inline. > > On 11 Aug 10, Mike Turquette wrote: >> On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU >> hotplug and some which do not.  Currently the prescence of an 'online' >> sysfs entry in userspace is ade

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpumask: introduce cpumask for hotpluggable CPUs

2011-08-10 Thread Amit Kucheria
See comments inline. On 11 Aug 10, Mike Turquette wrote: > On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU > hotplug and some which do not. Currently the prescence of an 'online' > sysfs entry in userspace is adequate for applications to know that a CPU > supports hotplug, bu

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpumask: introduce cpumask for hotpluggable CPUs

2011-08-10 Thread Daniel Lezcano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/10/2011 10:03 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU > hotplug and some which do not. Currently the prescence of an 'online' > sysfs entry in userspace is adequate for applications to kno

[PATCH v2 1/2] cpumask: introduce cpumask for hotpluggable CPUs

2011-08-10 Thread Mike Turquette
On some platforms it is possible to have some CPUs which support CPU hotplug and some which do not. Currently the prescence of an 'online' sysfs entry in userspace is adequate for applications to know that a CPU supports hotplug, but there is no convenient way to make the same determination in the