On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
>
> We need them because _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But
> under Xen you
sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
We need them because _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But
under Xen you might be communicating with a completely external entity
who might be on anoth
