On 17 April 2011 17:46, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
> [...]
>> +static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>> + struct mmc_test_multiple_rw *tdata,
>> + unsigned int reqsize,
On 17 April 2011 09:09, Lin Tony-B19295 wrote:
> Hi Per
>
> Just have a glance of your patch, good thinking. But I have a question
> about this patch. You modified mmc_test to test your driver. Does it mean
> your driver's performance enhancement depends on application?
I added those test
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
[...]
> +static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
> + struct mmc_test_multiple_rw *tdata,
> + unsigned int reqsize, unsigned int size)
> +{
> + unsigned int dev
lto:linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Per Forlin
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:07 AM
To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Chris Ball; Per Forlin
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/12] mmc: mmc_
Add four tests for read and write performance per
different transfer size, 4k to 4M.
* Read using blocking mmc request
* Read using none blocking mmc request
* Write using blocking mmc request
* Write using none blocking mmc request
The host dirver must support pre_req() and post_req()
in orde
