On 1 February 2015 at 22:03, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Lisa Nguyen wrote:
>> With this new change, the final result for the cpufreq_09
>> script will always show up and be counted in LAVA.
>
> Why?
I'll look into this in detail. It was a quick hack since the
cpufreq_
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Lisa Nguyen wrote:
> With this new change, the final result for the cpufreq_09
> script will always show up and be counted in LAVA.
Why?
> Signed-off-by: Lisa Nguyen
> ---
> cpufreq/cpufreq_09.sh |5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
With this new change, the final result for the cpufreq_09
script will always show up and be counted in LAVA.
Signed-off-by: Lisa Nguyen
---
cpufreq/cpufreq_09.sh |5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpufreq/cpufreq_09.sh b/cpufreq/cpufreq_09.sh
index 3e40cb
