On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> Yes that should be helpful. Even the things your are suggesting are
> somewhat same with some patches submitted which sets cpufreq min/max
> constraint.
Hmm..let me see how soon can I code up a rough implementation!
Cheers!
--
-
Th
On 13 March 2012 15:44, Sundar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria
> wrote:
>> Sundar,
>
> Hi Amit,
>
>> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
>> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
>> peripheral drivers to be plugged in a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Sundar,
Hi Amit,
> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
> peripheral drivers to be plugged in as well. Amit is investigating
> that at present.
Wh
Sundar,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for the replies. One more query
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap
> wrote:
>
>>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>>> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you refer
Hi Amit,
Thanks for the replies. One more query
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you referring to different
>> customers aka consumer drivers who could use this f
On 11 March 2012 09:41, Sundar wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> I am new here; so please bear with my questions/doubts :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
>> implementations using frequency scaling up/down
Hi Amit,
I am new here; so please bear with my questions/doubts :)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
wrote:
> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the request
> from user. Different cpu rel
22, 2012 3:44 PM
>> To: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org
>> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; mj...@srcf.ucam.org; linux-
>> a...@vger.kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org;
>> amit.kach...@linaro.org; R, Durgadoss; rob....@linaro.org; patc...@linaro.or
am.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org;
> amit.kach...@linaro.org; R, Durgadoss; rob@linaro.org; patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation
>
> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling
Hi, only textual nitpicking below...
> user and the binding of these cooling devices to the corresponding
> trip points can be easily done as the registration API's return the
> cooling device pointer. The user of these api's are responsible for
API vs. api
use plural s: APIs
> +This interfa
This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level
implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the request
from user. Different cpu related cooling devices can be registered by the
user and the binding of these cooling devices to the corresponding
trip points can be easi
11 matches
Mail list logo
