Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

2013-06-20 Thread Peter Maydell
On 20 June 2013 22:56, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 19 June 2013 20:32, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Please use linaro-kernel list for sending patches. > I think linaro-kernel should be part of the cc, but I don't > think that there is any policy in regards to not sending patches > to linaro-dev. We had

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

2013-06-20 Thread Deepak Saxena
On 19 June 2013 20:32, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 June 2013 00:41, David Long wrote: > > This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on > patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding > special cases into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not w

Re: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

2013-06-19 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 20 June 2013 00:41, David Long wrote: > This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches > developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding special cases > into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This > approach separates the A

Re: Subject: [PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

2013-06-19 Thread Naresh Kamboju
Hi Dave, > This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches > developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding special cases > into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This > approach separates the ARM instruction parsing code in k

[PATCH 0/7] uprobes: Add uprobes support to ARM

2013-06-19 Thread David Long
This patch series adds basic uprobes support to ARM. It is based on patches developed earlier by Rabin Vincent. That approach of adding special cases into the kprobes instruction parsing code was not well received. This approach separates the ARM instruction parsing code in kprobes out into a