Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Use per cpuidle_device states

2012-09-03 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:05:11PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e8

Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Use per cpuidle_device states

2012-09-03 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab, > >> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idl

Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Use per cpuidle_device states

2012-08-31 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab, >> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states >> >> we have a single registration for the cpuidle states whic

Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Use per cpuidle_device states

2012-07-27 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab, > cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states > > we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes > sense. But now two new architectures are comi

[PATCH 0/5][RFC] Use per cpuidle_device states

2012-07-25 Thread Daniel Lezcano
Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab, cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states we have a single registration for the cpuidle states which makes sense. But now two new architectures are coming: tegra3 and big.LITTLE. These architectures have different cpus with d