Re: [PATCH 0/3] babbage: support bootable Linaro kernel

2010-10-19 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi Shawn, Le 19/10/2010 18:28, Shawn Guo a écrit : If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below. git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not there.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] babbage: support bootable Linaro kernel

2010-10-19 Thread Shawn Guo
Hi Eric, If I understand correctly, you meant the tree below. git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git Can you please tell which branch has both your bits and Wolfram's? I can find your bits on branch imx-for-2.6.37, but Wolfram's are not there. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Eric Bé

Re: [PATCH 0/3] babbage: support bootable Linaro kernel

2010-10-19 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, Le 19/10/2010 09:20, Amit Kucheria a écrit : Thanks for the patches. Could you please send patch 1& 2 to LAKML too for review? you will have to rebase on Sascha's tree as your first patch includes things which are already there. Eric ___ lina

Re: [PATCH 0/3] babbage: support bootable Linaro kernel

2010-10-19 Thread Amit Kucheria
Shawn, Thanks for the patches. Could you please send patch 1 & 2 to LAKML too for review? /Amit On 10 Oct 19, Shawn Guo wrote: > After Nicolas merged Wolfram Sang's imx51 mmc driver, the patches > are to add missing bits for getting a bootable Linaro mx51evk > kernel. > > It's not clear to me i

[PATCH 0/3] babbage: support bootable Linaro kernel

2010-10-18 Thread Shawn Guo
After Nicolas merged Wolfram Sang's imx51 mmc driver, the patches are to add missing bits for getting a bootable Linaro mx51evk kernel. It's not clear to me if the missing kernel configurations should be addressed in Linaro kernel tree or packaging. I patched mx51_defconfig anyway to show what are