Hi,
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
On 01/13/2012 05:22 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Anyway, I think the change is good. On systems with multiple MMC devices
the boot/probe can spend 100-200 ms alone just doing busylooping delays. I
think e.g. in mmc_rescan() the code uses frequently mm
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
From f447d78db65c6675e69466e8ed08364ff065ac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Antipov
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:51:03 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()
---
Shouldn't you add a proper patch description
On 01/13/2012 05:22 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Anyway, I think the change is good. On systems with multiple MMC devices
the boot/probe can spend 100-200 ms alone just doing busylooping delays. I
think e.g. in mmc_rescan() the code uses frequently mmc_delay(10).
I'm worrying about this:
mmc_dela
Hi Antipov,
Sorry for the delayed response. Please find some comments below:
On 12/21/2011 6:35 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
On 12/21/2011 03:25 PM, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
I have posted similar patch some time back.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm/2119.
Would you like to
On 12/21/2011 12:26 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
From f447d78db65c6675e69466e8ed08364ff065ac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Antipov
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:51:03 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 8 ++--
1 files changed, 2
On 12/21/2011 03:25 PM, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
I have posted similar patch some time back.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm/2119.
Would you like to comment on that?
- I believe we should forget about jiffies, HZ and other similar obsolete
timekeeping stuff;
- I have n
From f447d78db65c6675e69466e8ed08364ff065ac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Antipov
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:51:03 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: use usleep_range() in mmc_delay()
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.h |8 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a
