(adding Robin to 'cc)
On 22/04/13 07:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 19 November 2012 20:17, Punit Agrawal wrote:
The patch was picked up as-is from the RT patches as it implements a
functionality that we wanted to better control IRQ affinity. Being part
of the RT patches, I hope that it'll merge i
On 19 November 2012 20:17, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> The patch was picked up as-is from the RT patches as it implements a
> functionality that we wanted to better control IRQ affinity. Being part
> of the RT patches, I hope that it'll merge into mainline via that route
> and I am not going to try to
Hi,
On 11/19/2012 03:47 PM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> The patch was picked up as-is from the RT patches as it implements a
> functionality that we wanted to better control IRQ affinity. Being part
> of the RT patches, I hope that it'll merge into mainline via that route
> and I am not going to try to
s patch as well.
Cheers,
Punit
From 52a7d44f58a262e166575abc57aa0bd3bfc8cfbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
If we isolate CPUs, then we don't want random device interrup
52a7d44f58a262e166575abc57aa0bd3bfc8cfbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Gleixner
> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
>
> If we isolate CPUs, then we don't want random device interrupts on
>
On 12 November 2012 22:27, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> I am attaching a patch by Thomas Gleixner which adds a kernel
> command line parameter to set the defauilt IRQ affinity mask. Could
> you please integrate this in your tree for the next Linaro release?
>
> I've been using this patch for sometime no
On 13 November 2012 21:13, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> +1
>
> Me to maintain patches is not the best option at all, as often I have very
> little idea of what the patch is doing. (Though I have to do that in very
> rare cases, and right now I have another patch floating around with no one
> willing
On 11/13/2012 12:51 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:32 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12 November 2012 22:27, Punit Agrawal wrote:
I am attaching a patch by Thomas Gleixner which adds a kernel
command line parameter to set the defauilt IRQ affinity mask. Could
you please
nd of the wedge, then he might just take the
simplest approach and add it to his big.LITTLE MP branch ;-)
--
Tixy
> > From 52a7d44f58a262e166575abc57aa0bd3bfc8cfbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Thomas Gleixner
> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:47 +0200
> > Subject: [PAT
xner
> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:47 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
>
> If we isolate CPUs, then we don't want random device interrupts on
> them. Even w/o the user space irq balancer enabled we can end up with
> irqs o
012 16:59:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option
If we isolate CPUs, then we don't want random device interrupts on
them. Even w/o the user space irq balancer enabled we can end up with
irqs on non boot cpus.
Allow to restrict the default irq affini
11 matches
Mail list logo
