Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: interactive: introduce hispeed2 for big LITTLE systems

2013-01-01 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29 December 2012 01:11, Todd Poynor wrote: > Thanks Viresh, I'm out of the office right now but will look at this more > closely early next year. Happy New Year!! > There's discussions starting among various folks about how to handle > big.LITTLE and what role cpufreq governors vs. platform c

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: interactive: introduce hispeed2 for big LITTLE systems

2012-12-28 Thread Todd Poynor
Thanks Viresh, I'm out of the office right now but will look at this more closely early next year. There's discussions starting among various folks about how to handle big.LITTLE and what role cpufreq governors vs. platform code play a part in that, so all this will probably be something a little

[PATCH] cpufreq: interactive: introduce hispeed2 for big LITTLE systems

2012-12-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
Latest big LITTLE systems for ARM SoC's have following kind of ranges of freqs: LITTLE CPU ranges: x MHz -> y MHz big CPU ranges: y + delta -> z MHz For these, we use hispeed_freq as y MHz, to avoid a switch of clusters from LITTLE to big when load burst comes. Similar to non big.LITTLE systems, w