On 06/28/2012 01:04 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 06:16:33 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 06/27/2012 02:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
>>> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
>>> acpi cod
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 06:16:33 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 02:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> > driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
> > acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
On 06/27/2012 03:06 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that such a dependency between 2 modules is not
> nice. But your patch will have bad side-effects (see comments
> embedded below).
>
> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:07:48 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> When the system is booted with
Hi,
I agree that such a dependency between 2 modules is not
nice. But your patch will have bad side-effects (see comments
embedded below).
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:07:48 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> driver is not initialized. When a
On 06/27/2012 02:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
>
> Thi
When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
