o-dev@lists.linaro.org
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP PM: Optimize cpufreq transition latency
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Vishwanath BS wrote:
>>> Currently cpufreq transition latency value does not really reflect the
>>actual
>>> OMAP OPP transition dela
Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: Turquette, Mike [mailto:mturque...@ti.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:20 AM
> To: Vishwanath BS
> Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP PM: Optimize cpufreq transition laten
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Vishwanath BS wrote:
> Currently cpufreq transition latency value does not really reflect the actual
> OMAP OPP transition delay. This patch has the actual latency value.
> I did profile the DVFS latency on OMAP3430, OMAP3630 and OMAP4 for
> worstcase(MPU and Core
Currently cpufreq transition latency value does not really reflect the actual
OMAP OPP transition delay. This patch has the actual latency value.
I did profile the DVFS latency on OMAP3430, OMAP3630 and OMAP4 for
worstcase(MPU and Core together) and found that in none of these platforms,
transito
