Daniel Lezcano writes:
> On 05/30/2012 08:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>>
>>> On 05/14/2012 06:42 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
> ev
On 05/30/2012 08:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano writes:
>
>> On 05/14/2012 06:42 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 May 2012 03:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
even if the cpuidle option is not s
Daniel Lezcano writes:
> On 05/14/2012 06:42 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 May 2012 03:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
>>> even if the cpuidle option is not set in the kernel.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes this by c
On 05/14/2012 06:42 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 03:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
>> even if the cpuidle option is not set in the kernel.
>>
>> This patch fixes this by creating a section in the Makefil
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
even if the cpuidle option is not set in the kernel.
This patch fixes this by creating a section in the Makefile where these
files are compiled only if the CONFIG_CPU_I
The current Makefile compiles the cpuidle34xx.c and cpuidle44xx.c files
even if the cpuidle option is not set in the kernel.
This patch fixes this by creating a section in the Makefile where these
files are compiled only if the CONFIG_CPU_IDLE option is set.
This modification breaks an implicit d
