Re: [PATCH][v2] ARM: davinci: cpuidle - remove ops

2012-05-23 Thread Sekhar Nori
On 5/23/2012 12:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 05/22/2012 07:58 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On 5/21/2012 3:37 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> This patch removes the ops usage because we have the index >>> passed as parameter to the idle function and we can determine >>> if we do WFI

Re: [PATCH][v2] ARM: davinci: cpuidle - remove ops

2012-05-22 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/22/2012 07:58 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: Hi Daniel, On 5/21/2012 3:37 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: This patch removes the ops usage because we have the index passed as parameter to the idle function and we can determine if we do WFI or memory retention. The benefit of this cleanup is the remova

Re: [PATCH][v2] ARM: davinci: cpuidle - remove ops

2012-05-22 Thread Sekhar Nori
Hi Daniel, On 5/21/2012 3:37 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This patch removes the ops usage because we have the index > passed as parameter to the idle function and we can determine > if we do WFI or memory retention. > > The benefit of this cleanup is the removal of: > * the ops > * the statedat

[PATCH][v2] ARM: davinci: cpuidle - remove ops

2012-05-20 Thread Daniel Lezcano
This patch removes the ops usage because we have the index passed as parameter to the idle function and we can determine if we do WFI or memory retention. The benefit of this cleanup is the removal of: * the ops * the statedata usage because we want to get rid of it in all the drivers * extra s