FYI: I heard from Zen yesterday that public IPv6 support isn't on their roadmap
as yet, so anything we do would purely have to be about internal testing of
IPv6 support.
Thanks
Dave
On 11 Dec 2012, at 14:51, Alexander Sack wrote:
> OK,
>
> In general it feels like this is a bit lower priori
OK,
In general it feels like this is a bit lower priority than many other topics ...
I propose: let's create a "LAVA lab IPv6 support" roadmap card where
we collect the elements of IPv6 support.
Milestone forecast for delivery would be April or May 2013 for now I
guess. Anyone volunteers to crea
Alexander Sack writes:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Pigott wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager
>> (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be
>> considering dual running at some point in the future,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Pigott wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just discussing IPv6 with Philip Colmer, our new IT Services Manager
> (cc'd on this mail), and it strikes me that we should at least be considering
> dual running at some point in the future, i.e. providing both v4 and v6.
