On 14 November 2012 15:55, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:06:49AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Whatever doesn't break HMP patches can go into master directly. The purpose
>> here is, that partners should be able to test HMP stuff on their boards with
>> Linaro kernel.
>
> So the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:06:49AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 15:23, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:33:29AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
>
> Hi Liviu,
>
> >> There are two categories of branches/patches that are kept here. One that
> >> are
On 14 November 2012 15:23, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:33:29AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
Hi Liviu,
>> There are two categories of branches/patches that are kept here. One that are
>> guaranteed to work on current big LITTLE system (Tested on ARM Vexpress TC2)
>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:33:29AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
Hi Viresh,
> There have been few discussion on how big LITTLE MP tree should be managed as
> it is getting PULL requests from a wide range of patches working
> towards making our
> system more power efficient.
>
Hello everybody,
There have been few discussion on how big LITTLE MP tree should be managed as
it is getting PULL requests from a wide range of patches working
towards making our
system more power efficient.
The following scheme is finalized and is detailed here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingG
