On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:34:48PM +0300, saeed bishara wrote:
>> Russell,
>> I'm curious about the correctness of this patch for systems with
>> outer cache. shouldn't the dsb be issued before
>
> +static inline void __dma_sync(void)
> +{
> + dsb();
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Return whether the given device DMA address mask can be supported
> * properly. For example, if your device can only drive the low 24-bits
> @@ -378,6 +383,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_map_single(struct device
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2011 16:06, Ken Werner wrote:
>> >
>> > Currently the GCC ARM backend doesn't provide a pattern to inline 64bit
>> > __sync_* functions but the compiler emits __sync_*_8 function
