Hi,
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 06:30:49 PM Pawel Moll wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> More and more of people are getting interested in the subject of power
> (energy) consumption monitoring. We have some external tools like
> "battery simulators", energy probes etc., but some targets can measure
>
Hi,
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 06:30:49 PM Pawel Moll wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> More and more of people are getting interested in the subject of power
> (energy) consumption monitoring. We have some external tools like
> "battery simulators", energy probes etc., but some targets can measure
>
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 06:16:33 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 02:37 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> > driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
> > acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
Hi,
I agree that such a dependency between 2 modules is not
nice. But your patch will have bad side-effects (see comments
embedded below).
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:07:48 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> driver is not initialized. When a
Hi,
sorry for the late reply...
On Monday 28 February 2011 17:52:23 Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
...
> Also, cpuidle states name in pytimechart are very selfishly hardcoded
> with intel's convention.
> Can you tell what is your co
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:05:49 Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
> Thanks David.
> If I would like to fine tune up_threshold and sampling_down_factor for
> say OMAP platform, is there any way to do it in kernel itself?
> I know these are configurable via sysfs entries. But if I want to
> optimize t
