On 12/18/11 17:03, Richard Zhao wrote:
>
> Do you have to patch to implement per-cpu udelay? In current code, udelay uses
> global loops_per_jiffy.
>
>
We've been carrying forward the timer based udelay patches. They're in
the patch tracker as 6873/1, 6874/1, and 6875/1.
--
Sent by an employee o
On 06/16/2011 11:54 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 16 June 2011 21:40, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> The ARM ARM says these fields are IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED meaning that
>> different vendors may attribute different meaning to these fields if
>> they wish. Does that mean this
On 06/16/2011 01:49 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> +config SCHED_MC
> + bool "Multi-core scheduler support"
> + depends on SMP && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY
> + default n
> + help
> + Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision
> + making when dealing with mul
