On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 19:49 +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Arnd, Rob,
>>>> So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm no
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Arnd, Rob,
> So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now
> trying to sort out the following HDMI failure I'm seeing w/ the current
> 3.5-rc with my Panda Board.
>
> [ 2.973693] omapdss error: HPD IRQ request
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> MMC1 is not the only instance that can be used/wired for SD.
> So remove this assumption from the driver.
>
> Now that all the mmc id based usage is removed, get rid
> of all the DEVID defines and also the 'id' field from the
> omap_hsmmc_
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> MMC1 is not the only instance that can be used/wired for SD.
> So remove this assumption from the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 14 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> This series mainly cleans up all instances of hardcoding's in
> the driver based on pdev->id. This is cleanup leading to the
> DT adaptation of omap_hsmmc driver.
>
> Patches are based on 3.3-rc2 and can be found here
> git://gitorious.org/om
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Reported by Russell King:
>
> mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 149201, nr 64,
> cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00
> mmcblk0: retrying using single block read
>
> WARNING: at /home/rmk/git/linux-2.6-rmk/lib/dma-debug.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
>> It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
>> compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
>> multiple cache le
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 10:53, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>&g
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 09:42, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>> Previously there has only been one function mmc_wait_for_req()
>>> to start and wait for a request. This patch adds
>>> * mmc_start_req() -
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> How significant is the cache maintenance over head?
> It depends, the eMMC are much faster now
> compared to a few years ago and cache maintenance cost more due to
> multiple cache levels and speculative cache pre-fetch. In relation the
> cost f
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> Don't use the returned sg_len from dma_map_sg() as inparameter
> to dma_unmap_sg(). Use the original sg_len for both dma_map_sg
> and dma_unmap_sg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files cha
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> pre_req() runs dma_map_sg(), post_req() runs dma_unmap_sg.
> If not calling pre_req() before omap_hsmmc_request()
> dma_map_sg will be issued before starting the transfer.
> It is optional to use pre_req(). If issuing pre_req()
> post_req() must
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
>
> On 10.06.2011 20:41, Mounir Bsaibes wrote:
>>
>> == Meetings minutes ==
>> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Meetings/2011-06-08
>
> Does anybody have some additional details on MMC HPI interrupts?
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Worki
13 matches
Mail list logo
