On 15 August 2012 09:23, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running
> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-jb-gcc47-tilt-tracking-blob,
> build 23 (Aug15). It's kernel version is 3.4.0-xxx, but 'perf --version'
> reports 3.0.8_android.
> Why such a version mismatch? Us
On 24 May 2012 16:11, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> http://xania.org/201205/gcc-explorer
>
> Could we get Matt to provide a cross-compiler environment too? He's
> already using gcc-linaro anyway.. ;-)
He appears to provide a 4.5 version of our cross-compiler environment
? Click on "compiler
On 15 May 2012 13:45, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 13:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On 15 May 2012 12:54, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> Basically a gadget that allows you to use one sd card shared by two
>>> computers.
>>>
>>> Power o
On 15 May 2012 12:54, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On 15 May 2012 12:38, Loïc Minier wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/104422661029399872488/posts/3K
On 15 May 2012 12:38, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/104422661029399872488/posts/3KpdBSzW4FK
>
> awesome!! how expensive is it to build in the end? Will we build some
> for LAVA folks to play with?
It sounds very nice and useful -
Riku,
On 24 November 2011 13:32, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to let you all know, due to the ongoing multiarch work, it is not
> possible to cross-compile
> relatively complex packages in ubuntu. For example, following the
> instructions[1], Firefox.
Out of curiosity and having a few minu
>>
>> a double check that this doesn't result in there being a spike in the
>> results for 2011.10 would be good. If not, historical data needs to be
>> measured for this change given that the said options weren't used while
>> measuring the historical data.
>
> Neither the 2011.09 nor the soon to
sed
while measuring the historical data.
Cheers,
Ramana
---
Ramana Radhakrishnan
Toolchain Working Group
Linaro
http://www.linaro.org
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 19 August 2011 13:40, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:40:26AM +0100, Chao Yang wrote:
>> The image size increases significantly when -O3 is enabled for thumb files,
>
> Size goes /up/ when enabling thumb? That's definitely unexpected.
The size increas is probably mo
> . Would you be interested in adding a Firefox-based benchmark? As a large
> application it is a good testbed for LTO, FDO and other aggressive
> optimizations.
Sorry about the delayed response. I did notice your mail last week but
I was busy with our conference and then the first couple of days
On 01/06/11 19:41, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
> call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
> from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
> needs to b
On Thursday, 12 May 2011, AKS wrote:
>
> What flag I have to pass in making? I mean what to type in after CCFLAGS=
> in make or what to be added in Makefile. Thanks!
Try using -marm.
Ramana
>
> ___
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linar
On 6 May 2011 16:06, Ken Werner wrote:
>
> Currently the GCC ARM backend doesn't provide a pattern to inline 64bit
> __sync_* functions but the compiler emits __sync_*_8 function calls [1]. The
> libgcc does not provide these symbols via the usual thin wrapper around the
> kernel helper [2] becaus
On 28/04/11 09:01, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia 2011-04-27, śro o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan pisze:
Please note that the cmdline I have at the minute has the following line :
mem=456M@0x8000 mem=512M@0xA000
Thus I would expect there to be atleast 968M of RAM
On 28/04/11 09:01, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia 2011-04-27, śro o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan pisze:
Please note that the cmdline I have at the minute has the following line :
mem=456M@0x8000 mem=512M@0xA000
Thus I would expect there to be atleast 968M of RAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/707047
This bug has been marked "fix released" for linaro-image-tools, but there
has not been an update of linaro-image-tools in Ubuntu natty since February.
If you use linaro-media-create from the bzr branch when writing to the SD
card, you s
Hi,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/633227
seems to suggest we can now use 1GB of RAM on a Panda board.
Creating a new image using the following images and hwpacks for my Panda :
BOARD=panda linaro-media-create --rootfs ext4 --mmc /dev/mmcblk1
--binary linaro-n-d
> Agreed. I'd like an easy way of getting pre-built binaries of all the
> stable enough Linaro outputs. On the toolchain side this would
> include the latest monthly releases of Linaro GCC, GDB, and QEMU in
> native and cross versions as appropriate. A single PPA for the whole
> of Linaro would
>
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -g -DDEBUG -Os -fno-strict-aliasing
> > -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -ffunction-sections -msoft-float -Wcast-align
> > -Wall -D__KERNEL__ -DTEXT_BASE= -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -isystem
> > /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.5.1/include -pipe -march=armv4t
> > -mlong-calls
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 14:47 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> I'd like to record the running of a typical program such as Firefox,
> GCC, or ffmpeg and capture the calls and arguments to functions like
> strcpy() and memcpy(). The idea is to generate a usage profile so we
> can tell what standard libr
20 matches
Mail list logo
