On 16 February 2011 06:24, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Zygmunt Krynicki <
> zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, when you mentioned this now I started thinking. Do we really need a
>> daemon-like component for the dispatcher in general or just in the far
On 16 February 2011 06:10, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>
>
>> Another crazy option would be to expose LAVA Job Dispatcher directly and
>>> allow people to run jobs. In this case one job would use abrek and some
>>> other tools to invoke tests, process results and send them to the dashboard
>>> while oth
On 16 February 2011 05:27, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 16.02.2011 11:22, Mirsad Vojnikovic pisze:
>
>
>
> Zygmunt has already identified key points for Job Dispatcher to support
>> this, but one thing I would like to comment:
>>
>>Another crazy o
Hi all!
This is very good analysis you have done, and I would just add that Monkey
is only one simpler example where the test execution using abrek is not an
option. Another example from Android world is CTS:
http://source.android.com/compatibility/cts-intro.html. Most certainly, all
test suites a
On 9 February 2011 20:12, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> 2. One queue TOTAL. One queue may seem like a bottleneck, but I don't
think it has to be in practice. One process can monitor that queue, then
launch a process or thread to handle
I have now updated the spec with your comments, thanks!
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/Specs/ValidationScheduler
On 11 February 2011 06:52, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> Ah, you are correct, that's excellent - a user story in the scheduler
>> should then look something like this: "Dave w
On 9 February 2011 20:12, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> 2. One queue TOTAL. One queue may seem like a bottleneck, but I don't
think it has to be in practice. One process can monitor that queue, then
launch a process or thread to handle
On 10 February 2011 05:41, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 10 February 2011 13:14, Mirsad Vojnikovic
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10 February 2011 04:30, David Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> >> OK, there were a few cases I was thinking here:
> >> 1) A batch of n
On 10 February 2011 04:30, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 10 February 2011 12:19, Mirsad Vojnikovic
> wrote:
> > That I wrote:
>
> >> I'd like to add as user stories:
> >> Dave wants to rerun a test on a particular machine to see if a
> >> failure
On 7 February 2011 02:05, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 4 February 2011 21:53, Paul Larson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mirsad, I'm looking at the recent edits to
> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/Specs/ValidationSchedulerand
> > wanted to start a thread to discuss. Would love to hear thoughts f
On 4 February 2011 13:53, Paul Larson wrote:
>
> Hi Mirsad, I'm looking at the recent edits to
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Validation/Specs/ValidationScheduler and
> wanted to start a thread to discuss. Would love to hear thoughts from
> others as well.
>
> We could probably use some more
11 matches
Mail list logo
