Re: AArch64 toolchain status

2014-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, January 31, 2014 07:21:02 Ryan Harkin wrote: > On 30 January 2014 21:31, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the simulator knows nothing of disk partitions and things like that. you > > have > > to manage the disk image yourself. > > Mike, unless I misunderstand

Re: AArch64 toolchain status

2014-01-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 18:10:43 Anil Singhar wrote: > I am using the following command to start the foundation model: > > --- > anilss@anilss:~/Linaro/tools/Foundation_v8pkg/models/Linux64_GCC-4.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

2012-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 18:35:28 Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:11:27 Chander Kashyap wrote: > > > +int main(int argc, char **argv) > > > +{ > > > ... > >

Re: [Samsung] [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

2012-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 09 February 2012 00:25:35 Chander Kashyap wrote: > On 9 February 2012 09:21, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 February 2012 18:35:28 Doug Anderson wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > On Thursday 02 February

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

2012-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

2012-02-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 03 February 2012 11:05:57 Chander Kashyap wrote: > board/samsung/smdk5250/tools/mkexynos_image.c | 117 > create mode 100644 tools/mksmdk5250spl.c something funky in your diffstat ... says you're creating tools/ but the diffstat shows board/.../tools/. but the diff below looks correc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

2012-02-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:11:27 Chander Kashyap wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tools/mkexynos_image.c tools should be in tools/. there are already plenty of examples in there (see tools/msxboot.c as the first example i found by reading tools/Makefile). > +int main(i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

2012-01-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 08:03:20 Chander Kashyap wrote: > --- a/include/configs/smdk5250.h > +++ b/include/configs/smdk5250.h > > +#define CONFIG_NET_MULTI dead define -> delete > +#define CONFIG_ETHADDR "00:40:5c:26:0a:5b" as Simon said, delete this too -mike signatur

Re: [U-Boot] Patches for SMSC LAN911X driver on UBoot and QEMU

2011-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 11 November 2011 08:28:13 Cachet Bertrand wrote: > I have made some modification to the SMSC LAN911X driver for both UBoot and > QEMU in order to be able to use SMSC LAN9X based network drivers during > the u-boot stage. i'm not sure if you're attempting to get things merged into upstrea

Re: [PATCH] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v8

2011-10-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:26, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 16:35, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>> 2011/9/30 Grant Likely: >>&

Re: [PATCH] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v8

2011-10-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:48, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > (...) >>> I was more thinking along the lines of one device per GPIO controller, >>> then you ioctl() to ask /dev/gpio0 how

Re: [PATCH] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v8

2011-10-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 16:35, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 12:39:21PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> 2011/9/30 Grant Likely: >> > I'm not convinced that the sysfs approach is >> > actually the right interface here (I'm certainly not a fan of the gpio >> > sysfs i/f), and I'd rather

Re: More pinmux feedback, and GPIO vs. pinmux interaction

2011-06-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 15:12, Stephen Warren wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:07 AM: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> > Some more thoughts on pinmux: can you guys start cc-ing uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org on future pinmux discussion