Hi,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Not sure there's much point looking very deeply into this. Java
> > programs are threaded, threaded programs don't work under QEMU =>
> > don't try to run Java under QEMU :-)
>
> Having said that I'm sure there was another SIGILL related crash on
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Dann Frazier wrote:
> I've narrowed down the changes that seem to prevent both types of
> segfaults to the following changes that introduce a wrapper around
> sigprocmask:
>
> https://github.com/susematz/qemu/commit/f1542ae9fe10d5a241fc2624ecaef5f0948e3472
> https://gith
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 13:33, Michael Matz wrote
> > The biggest road-block is that signal vs syscall handling is
> > fundamentally broken in linux-user and it's unfixable without
> > assembler implementations of the sy
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> There are some pretty large differences between these trees with
> >> respect to signal syscalls - is that the likely culprit?
> >
> > Quite likely. We explicitly concentrated on the arch64 specific
> > instruction emulation leaving more gene
