RE: Linux 3.4-rc1

2012-04-05 Thread Marek Szyprowski
ected to be merged via akpm tree together with other core memory management patches. I got a message that Andrew Morton scheduled it for v3.5 kernel, so it should be soon available in linux-next tree. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung

RE: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] cma: fix limit adjustment in dma_declare_contiguous()

2012-01-10 Thread Marek Szyprowski
= ALIGN(limit, alignment); > + limit &= ~(alignment - 1); > > /* Reserve memory */ > if (base) { > -- Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

RE: CMA vs HIGHMEM issue

2011-12-20 Thread Marek Szyprowski
hat really want a 64 bit machine anyway. I know, I just suggested it as a workaround of the current CMA initialization bug. The other temporary solution is to enable DMA zone and set it to some high value (like 512MiB). Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center __

RE: CMA vs HIGHMEM issue

2011-12-19 Thread Marek Szyprowski
> If it's expected to blow chunks, is there a hack or workaround that will > allow us to have both HIGHMEM and CMA on OMAP4? I'm aware of this issue, I hope to post a fix ASAP I finish some of my urgent bug fixing related to our project. In meantime I suggest using 2G/2G me

RE: [PATCH V2] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig

2011-06-03 Thread Marek Szyprowski
v-ehci.c is the only consumer of setup-usb-phy.c, > could setup-usb-phy.o be made dependent on the S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI config > option? Any particular reason to create a new EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY > config option in this case? Will there be a case where usb phy > configuration

RE: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-10 Thread Marek Szyprowski
lution). > > I am currently aware of the following solutions floating around the net > that all solve different parts of the problem: > > In the kernel: GEM and TTM. > Out-of-tree: HWMEM, UMP, CMA, VCM, CMEM, PMEM. > > I'm sure that last list is incomplete. Best re

RE: [st-ericsson] v4l2 vs omx for camera

2011-03-01 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:26 AM Edward Hervey wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hello, > [...] > > > > I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force > > systems with rather small

RE: [st-ericsson] v4l2 vs omx for camera

2011-02-28 Thread Marek Szyprowski
or making physically contiguous >segments available. I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem just to support DMA allocable memory. It also doesn't solve the issue with specific mem