Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: add support for 8250/16550 earlyprintk

2013-03-01 Thread Marc Zyngier
egs: > earlyprintk=uart8250-8bit, > > Kernel args for 32-bit aligned regs: > earlyprintk=uart8250-32bit, > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Looks OK to me. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier -- Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick two. __

Re: [PATCH] arm64: add support for 8250/16550 earlyprintk

2013-03-01 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:30:26 +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > This patch adds support for using earlyprintk with 8250/16550 UART ports. > > The 8250/16550 UART can either have 8-bit or 32-bit aligned registers > which is HW vendor dependent. > > Kernel args for 8-bit aligned regs: > earlyprintk=uart82

Re: [PATCH v4 21/24] arm/v2m: initialize arch_timers even if v2m_timer is not present

2013-01-07 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 07/01/13 17:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Pawel Moll wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 12:13 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini >>>> CC: Russel

Re: [kvmarm] [RFC] KVM on arm64

2013-01-04 Thread Marc Zyngier
gt; What are we missing here ? Don't know, really. The config file may be incomplete. For completeness, I attach the one I use. Cheers, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...>From 5bf8d386656d6ebbefcfbe3a75086c4c19265b03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier Date:

Re: [kvmarm] [PATCH] bootwrapper: CPU hotplug aware boot protocol

2012-12-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/12/12 15:54, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:10 -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 13:52 -0800, Christoffer Dall wrote: On Friday, December 7, 2012, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:

Re: [PATCH v4 16/24] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST

2012-09-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/09/12 15:28, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 14/09/12 15:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>> On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>>>> Reset the

Re: [PATCH v4 16/24] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST

2012-09-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/09/12 15:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Reset the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST flags that are enabled by >>> default on ARM. If IRQ_NOAUTOEN is set, __setup_irq doesn&#

Re: [PATCH v4 02/24] xen/arm: hypercalls

2012-09-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/09/12 15:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> +/* HVC 0xEA1 */ >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL >>> +#define xen_hvc .word 0xf7e08ea1 >>> +#else >>> +#define xen_hvc .word 0xe140ea71 >>> +#e

Re: [PATCH v4 16/24] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST

2012-09-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Reset the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST flags that are enabled by > default on ARM. If IRQ_NOAUTOEN is set, __setup_irq doesn't call > irq_startup, that is responsible for calling irq_unmask at startup time. > As a result event channels remain masked.

Re: [PATCH v4 02/24] xen/arm: hypercalls

2012-09-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor. > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument. > > Among the available registers r12 seems to be the