Hi Mathieu,
Since this is for Maverick, this needs the appropriate SRU justification
written up in the bug report. It's also a good rule of thumb to post
the SRU justification to the body of the email as well. Also, has this
patch been submitted upstream? If so, it would be good to add a
refere
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:52 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/25/2010 12:26 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just sent these patch series to linux-omap upstream. These patch series
> > fixes
> > and improves the support for IGEP v2 board and I think could be interesting
> > t
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:23 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven
> >
> > In order for PowerTOP to be able to report how well the new runtime PM is
> > working for the various drivers, the kernel needs to export some basic
> > sta
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 10:37 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 12:31 AM, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven
> >
> > PowerTOP wants to be able to show the user how effective the ALPM link
> > power management is for the user. ALPM is worth around 0.5W on a quiet
> > link;
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 14:30 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Yong,
>
> You forgot to add a note as to why you need these patches applied :)
>
> Reviewers - these patches expose some new information related to
> runtime PM that powertop can show.
>
> This patch -1/3, is already in 2.6.36-rc. The oth
This patch doesn't apply cleanly to the current Ubuntu Maverick linux
kernel as it appears we're already carrying a version of this patch:
commit ce3cdc8812cc8a6f5645a9c372c7d6227676a7e5
Author: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Sun Oct 25 15:37:04 2009 -0700
UBUNTU: SAUCE: vfs: Add a trace point in
