Re: Perf record format portability

2012-05-17 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:39:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip: > &g

Re: Perf record format portability

2012-05-16 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Steve, > > > > Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in > > mind? I.e. cross analysis? I must be missing something here, still > >

Re: Perf record format portability

2012-05-16 Thread Jiri Olsa
hed_process_fork, sched:sched_wakeup > > >>and sched:sched_migrate_task) on the same architecture? > > > > > >Endianness issues? ARM EB? There are some patches by Jiri Olsa that may > > >help you if that is the case. latest version sent today, there's de