Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] sched: Integrating Per-entity-load-tracking with the core scheduler

* Peter Zijlstra wrote: > [...] > > So a sane series would introduce maybe two functions: > cpu_load() and task_load() and use those where we now use > rq->load.weight and p->se.load.weight for load balancing > purposes. Implement these functions using those two > expression. So effectively

Re: [GIT PULL 0/7] perf/core improvements and fixes

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Please consider pulling. > > Tested on RHEL6.2, Fedora 17 x86 and x86_64, > > - Arnaldo > > The following changes since commit 357398e96d8c883b010379a7669df43ed0e2e32b: > > perf/x86: Fix section mismatch in uncore_pci_init() (20

Re: [PATCH] sched: generalize CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING for X86 and ARM

* Dmitry Antipov wrote: > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -757,18 +757,20 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpu_hardirq_time); > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpu_softirq_time); > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, irq_start_time); > -static int sched_clock_irqtime; > > -void

Re: [PATCH] sched: move CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING to common code

* Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Since CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is architecture-agnostic, > move it from x86 area to common code. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 --- > lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletio