s out for review on those all the time on the dri-devel
> list. Snowball support has not quite made it to igloocommunity, but
> that should be in progress.
>
> It's a work in progress, but we are making that progress all the time.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> cheers,
&
s out for review on those all the time on the dri-devel
> list. Snowball support has not quite made it to igloocommunity, but
> that should be in progress.
>
> It's a work in progress, but we are making that progress all the time.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> cheers,
&
isn't new or
> in the kernel). Even the interfaces exported by DRM require user
> space code to orchestrate them (i.e., no kernel acceleration in the
> purest sense).
>
> cheers,
> Jesse
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
&g
for kernel-space (kind of drm but for much more tailored
for 2D blitters).
-Ilyes
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:18:17PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> I've previously read (probably on Phoronix) that Linaro is working out
Hi,
I've previously read (probably on Phoronix) that Linaro is working out
a 'standard' kernel interface for 2D blitters IPs as commonly found on
SoCs.
Has it ever been the case? If yes, are there any
documentation/references online?
Thanks,
-Ilyes
_
