> Bingo, that was the problem in my setup: as the patch was applied
> through a script with others, I had missed the error message about the
> conflict (I have also another conflict which can be safely ignored so
> the new one did not catch my eye)... So the patch was only
> half-applied, and the f
* Vincent Guittot [2013-02-13 13:08]:
> Damien,
> Regarding your sched_domain config and especially the flags field, you
> should not be impacted by my patch because
> - need_active_balance is the only new place that use env->src_cpu in
> the load_balance function
> - and your machine will never t
* Vincent Guittot [2013-02-13 18:49]:
> I have look into Frederic's tree but i didn't find any reason that
> could explain your problem. May be Frederic will have some ideas
> I have also tested his branch with and without my patch and both
> kernel are booting (on an ARM platform without using th
Hi,
I tested this on top of 3.8-rc7 and this made the machine (x86_64, Core
i7 920) unable to boot (very early as nothing at all is displayed on
screen). Nothing in the kernel log (after booting with a working
kernel).
Double-checked by just backing out only this patch and this made the
machine b
