Re: Linus being annoyed by the ARM kernel code

2011-04-03 Thread Bryan Wu
lp each SoC maintainer to isolate their code and not introduce conflicts on platform level Just some basic thought, hope we can come our some real solutions and make Linus just merge without any complains, -:)) Thanks, -- Bryan Wu Kernel Developer    +86.138-1617-6545 Mobile Ubuntu Kernel Team

Re: GFX support in linaro omap4/panda kernel

2011-03-28 Thread Bryan Wu
for natty. > Yeah, I think you also need a kernel which enabled SGX supporting. We just merged those patches in latest Ubuntu kernel release: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-natty.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ti-omap4 Or, Andy Green and Ricardo can help to provide a kernel tree without

Re: powertop patches

2010-09-13 Thread Bryan Wu
I believe these patches will make powertop better for both x86 and ARM. So are they OK for omap4? If yes, I think we can apply them on ti-omap4 branch as well as master. -Bryan On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM, wrote: > This is for powertop to run better on kernel. the first patch is back port

Re: imx51 and CONFIG_NEON

2010-09-02 Thread Bryan Wu
HINE_START(MX51_BABBAGE, "Freescale MX51 Babbage >> Board") >>       .phys_io = MX51_AIPS1_BASE_ADDR, >>       .io_pg_offst = ((MX51_AIPS1_BASE_ADDR_VIRT) >> 18) & 0xfffc, >>       .boot_params = PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100, >> +     .fixup = fixup_mx51_babbage, >&g

Re: imx51 and CONFIG_NEON

2010-09-01 Thread Bryan Wu
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: >  Bryan, I think you had worked on a patch to only turn on NEON on TO3+ >  but not on TO1/TO2 boards? > Exactly, That's a silicon issue of TO1 and TO2, but Freescale fixed it in TO3+. Here is the NEON patch: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu