Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-08 Thread Andy Walls
Hi LAurent, On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:52 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Andy, [snip] > > > It really shouldn't be that hard to get everyone involved together and > > > settle on a single solution (either based on an existing proposal or > > > create a 'the best of' vendor-neutral solution).

Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-08 Thread Andy Walls
Hi Hans, On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 18:23 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > "Single" might be making the problem impossibly hard to solve well. > > One-size-fits-all solutions have a tendency to fall short on meeting > > someone's critical requirement. I will agree that "less than n", for > > some

Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-08 Thread Andy Walls
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:13 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist > V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like > GEM and HWMEM. > > Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM. > > http