Hi LAurent,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 16:52 +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Andy,
[snip]
> > > It really shouldn't be that hard to get everyone involved together and
> > > settle on a single solution (either based on an existing proposal or
> > > create a 'the best of' vendor-neutral solution).
Hi Hans,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 18:23 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > "Single" might be making the problem impossibly hard to solve well.
> > One-size-fits-all solutions have a tendency to fall short on meeting
> > someone's critical requirement. I will agree that "less than n", for
> > some
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:13 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We had a discussion yesterday regarding ways in which linaro can assist
> V4L2 development. One topic was that of sorting out memory providers like
> GEM and HWMEM.
>
> Today I learned of yet another one: UMP from ARM.
>
> http