Re: [RFC] Packaging for PowerDebug (a new tool)

Hello Marcin, Thanks for the review ! I Agree with the changes you have suggested and will take care of them. Regards, Amit Arora On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia wtorek, 16 listopada 2010 o 12:46:39 Amit Arora napisał(a): > >> As part of the Powe

[RFC] Packaging for PowerDebug (a new tool)

branch has only the source code for the tool. If you have fare idea about .deb packaging, I will request you to please review these files and suggest any changes that may be required. I have also uploaded this under my ppa (ppa:amitarora/pm-utils). Thanks!

Re: [PATCH] clocks: add clock debugging file

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Yong Shen wrote: Hi Yong, > After this patch, powerdebug (developed by Amit Arora in power management > group of Linaro) generates information on imx51 platform like this: You seem to be using a bit older version of PowerDebug. Please do a git pul

[PM] 10/11/2010 - Minutes for the Power Management WG weekly call

Hello Everyone, The minutes of the weekly call can be found at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-11-10 Attendees: Amit Arora, Amit Kachhap, Vincent, Yong and Vishwa Highlight: Discussed individual High Priority blue prints for status and any issues - specially

Re: Vexpress LTP questions

whats being passed by LTP test, then there is something wrong in how ARM is handling fallocate parameters. Else, the max file size supported by file system should be looked at (last variable in above printk). Regards, Amit Arora ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Current state of PM tools

your valuable feedback. Thanks! Regards, Amit Arora ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

[PM] 15/09/10 - Minutes for the Power Management WG weekly call

The minutes of the weekly call can be found at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-09-15 Attendees: Linaro: Amit Kucheria, Amit Arora, Yong Shen ARM: Srinivas Kalaga Thanks! Regards, Amit Arora ___ linaro-dev mailing

Re: [RFC] Making PowerTOP generic - Call for Testing and Review

please try and post this to the powertop list this week? Sure. Will wait for one more day for others to comment and then post it. Thanks! Regards, Amit Arora > Regards, > Amit ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

[RFC] Making PowerTOP generic - Call for Testing and Review

and hence is not introduced by the new patches. Since the goal of these patches is different, I haven't addressed this issue here. Note: Thanks a ton to people who tested my initial patches and provided their valuable feedback. Thanks ! Regards, Amit Arora ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make PowerTOP generic

then we should have some option in Makefile (LIBPATH & INCPATH) to point to it. Will it make sense to have a "readme.ARM" or some other file in powertop which describes this step ? Any suggestions on how best to do this ? Thanks! --

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove hardcoded c and p states

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 10 Jul 29, Amit Arora wrote: >> +/** >> + * print_generic_cstates() - Prints the list of supported C-states. >> + * >> + * This functions uses standard sysfs interface of the cpuidle framework >> + * to

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make PowerTOP generic

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia czwartek, 29 lipca 2010 o 13:57:21 Amit Arora napisał(a): >> I have tested this only on my desktop. I am yet to receive an ARM based >> board, and hence couldn't test it there. So, any kind of testing and/or

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make PowerTOP generic

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 10 Jul 29, Amit Arora wrote: >> >> Currently the PowerTOP tool is x86 centric and does not work on other >> architectures, unless some changes are made. >> >> This patchset removes the hardcoded value

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make PowerTOP generic

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 10 Jul 29, Amit Arora wrote: >> Amit Arora (2): >>   Add OMAP3 support to PowerTOP >>   Remove hardcoded c and p states >> >>  Makefile          |    2 +- >>  cpufreqstats.c  

[PATCH 2/2] Remove hardcoded c and p states

framework. Signed-off-by: Amit Arora --- Makefile |2 +- cpufreqstats.c|3 +- display.c | 15 ++--- generic_cstates.c | 63 omapcstates.c | 64 - powertop.c| 82

[PATCH 1/2] Add OMAP3 support to PowerTOP

This patch is based on http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Running_PowerTOP_on_OMAP35x_platform#Updates_to_PowerTOP Its a simple port from above location. Signed-off-by: Amit Arora --- Makefile |2 +- cpufreqstats.c |2 +- display.c | 18 --- omapcstates.c

[PATCH 0/2] Make PowerTOP generic

boards I have tested this only on my desktop. I am yet to receive an ARM based board, and hence couldn't test it there. So, any kind of testing and/or feedback are most welcome! Thanks! Amit Arora (2): Add OMAP3 support to PowerTOP Remove hardcoded c and p states Makefile |

[PM] Minutes for the Power Management WG weekly call

The Agenda and the Minutes for this meeting can also be found at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-07-28 Attendees : Amit Arora, Amit Kucheria, Bobby Bhatacharia, Srinivas Kalaga, Vishwanath Sripathy Minutes: * Review action items from last meeting o ACTION